Author Topic: Star Trek: Ascendancy  (Read 729 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #15 on: July 31, 2017, 06:28:01 PM »
Give me the heads up next time you're at UBC and we'll make it happen.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 07:19:22 PM by Silent Disapproval Robot »


Offline Barthheart

  • Order of the Square Button
  • Arquebusier
  • *
  • Posts: 12585
  • Looking for dark matter in deep, dark holes....
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #16 on: July 31, 2017, 07:05:23 PM »
Should be sometime in mid late September.
PETS - People for the Ethical Treatment of Square corners

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #17 on: August 03, 2017, 10:30:37 PM »
It arrived today.  It looks interesting.  I put it on the table and fiddled around with it for a bit.  I like the looks of some of the mechanics but I wonder about the 3-player aspect.  As setting up trade links with another player seems beneficial, I suspect it'll devolve into a 2 on 1 dogpile.  Looks like it'll be better when the 4 and 5 player expansions are released next month.

Offline BanzaiCat

  • Arquebusier
  • ***
  • Posts: 16229
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2017, 05:54:09 AM »
I suspect it'll devolve into a 2 on 1 dogpile.  Looks like it'll be better when the 4 and 5 player expansions are released next month.

It absolutely does result in a 2-on-1 dogpile (I've played it at the game store a couple of times). The weaker of the three will often get the other two's attention and they end up reaping the planets that the weaker one couldn't hold on to. Then the two go at it until one becomes a clear winner.

I really want to get a hold of at least one if not both expansions to see how it plays out that way. In a 5-player game, I imagine the trade aspect and temporary alliances play much better.

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #19 on: August 15, 2017, 11:42:09 PM »


Played this evening.  The mat on the table at the FLGS was headache inducing.  Klingons attacked me as the the Federation too early, lost badly and were pretty much out of the game from that point on.  Ended up being a race between the Federation and the Romulans with the Romulans managing to grab and ascendancy victory a turn before I could reach their home planet and take it through hegemony.

Offline BanzaiCat

  • Arquebusier
  • ***
  • Posts: 16229
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #20 on: August 16, 2017, 07:44:23 AM »
Was gonna say...that mat, though.  :o

Better to use a starfield map, or in my taste, a black tablecloth (which I use for covering my desk when I do video).

You can't attack too early in that game...Zerg rushing is a huge gamble since everyone starts on such equal footing.

They've got the two new expansions out (Ferengi and Cardassian) and said they'd be sending them out to reviewers post-Gen Con. I'm hoping these will really ramp up the play, though the table space is going to be a concern.

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #21 on: August 16, 2017, 08:48:22 AM »
Yup.  I have a couple of 3'x3' starfield mats that I usually use but the tables at this particular store aren't wide enough for them so I didn't bother. 

I've played the game 3 times now and am going to mod it a bit.  I think it's too easy to turtle and win via ascendancy tokens so I'm going to change the cost from 5 culture/token to an escalating cost. 5 for the 1st, 6 for the 2nd, etc.  I'll also limit it to one token purchase per round. 

Offline BanzaiCat

  • Arquebusier
  • ***
  • Posts: 16229
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #22 on: August 16, 2017, 09:51:22 AM »
I've played the game 3 times now and am going to mod it a bit.  I think it's too easy to turtle and win via ascendancy tokens so I'm going to change the cost from 5 culture/token to an escalating cost. 5 for the 1st, 6 for the 2nd, etc.  I'll also limit it to one token purchase per round.

That's a good idea. Escalating those costs will take away cheap wins.

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #23 on: August 17, 2017, 12:54:28 AM »
We tried out my house rule tonight and it worked pretty well.  Definitely prevented turtling.  I played the Klingons and was on the receiving end of a 2 vs 1 curb stomping from the Romulans and the Federation.  When two empires sign a trade deal that basically means they're outproducing you at a 3 to 1 ratio each, it's only a matter of time before the hammer falls.

As such, I decided to get aggressive.  I had some good luck and wiped out a 6 ship Romulan fleet with only one lost ship in return.  That got the Romulans off my doorstep for a turn or two so I then went after the Federation.  I was able to battle my way to Earth and wipe out their fleet there but just didn't have enough left over to take the planet.  The two of them then proceeded to roll me up and take my homeworld.  I suspect the Romulans had the edge at that point but we had to call it quits because the store was closing.  Fun game!






Offline BanzaiCat

  • Arquebusier
  • ***
  • Posts: 16229
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2017, 05:12:28 AM »
That starfield map is MUCH easier on the eyes. ;D

Online bbmike

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5192
    • AAR Central
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2017, 06:32:48 AM »
^+1, that look great!
"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence."
-Sherlock Holmes

"You know, just once I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets."
-Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart

"There's a horror movie called Alien? That's really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you!"
-The Doctor

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #26 on: August 31, 2017, 09:55:44 PM »
Picked up the Ferengi and Cardassian expansion packs today.  The Cardassians look like they'll play as a cross between the Romulans and Klingons.  Very aggressive but not as good in a straight up fight as the Klingons but they also have a bunch of annoying, sneaky espionage tech that lets them get fleets behind your lines and take your planets unless you garrison. 

I'm really looking forward to trying out the Ferengi.  They look like they're going to be tough to play but potentially a lot of fun and annoying as hell to the other players.  Weak in combat at the start, they have the ability to cross borders and set up trade in rival systems without requiring permission from other players.  If they aren't constantly getting slapped down, they'll start earning massive production and spamming crap fleets.

Offline BanzaiCat

  • Arquebusier
  • ***
  • Posts: 16229
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #27 on: September 01, 2017, 06:25:36 AM »
Looking forward to seeing it in action and getting them myself.

Offline Silent Disapproval Robot

  • Crossbowman
  • *
  • Posts: 5694
Re: Star Trek: Ascendancy
« Reply #28 on: September 02, 2017, 10:08:17 PM »
We had a 4-player game with the new expansions today.  It was very interesting to see how differently it played out with four players instead of three and to see how the new races interacted.  Expansion and contact occur much more rapidly and it makes things a lot more tense.

I played as the Ferengi and started in the southwest corner of the map.  The Klingons were in the south-east; the Cardassians in the northwest; and the Romulans in the northeast corner opposite from me.  The Federation didn't make an appearance in this game. 

The Cardassians had some good luck with their initial exploration efforts and found some very nice systems and didn't run into too many difficulties with dangerous encounters or phenomena.  They linked up with me very early in the match and things started off peacefully between us.  We established trade and delineated a border (which the bastards immediately ignored, leapfrogging ahead of my fleet and grabbing a juicy colony that I'd discovered the turn before).  Then I happened upon a very rich mining opportunity in an asteroid belt and the Cardassian weasel couldn't resist.  He broke our treaties and attacked my mining operations as well as a few of my colonies, wiping them out and doing a lot of damage to my fleets.  Thankfully I had the production reserves to rebuild my fleets and I was then able to return the favour and burn up all of his fleets and several of his colonies.  This left us both pathetically weak and exposed but thankfully I was relatively isolated.

The Klingons had initially tried to head in my direction but they encountered some deadly phenomena and lost a good number of ships while trying to find a passage to my sector of space.  Eventually, they gave up and went off in the direction of Romulus instead.  They engaged in typical Klingon style diplomacy and wiped out a Romulan mining fleet en route to invading the Romulan home world.  Luckily for the Romulans, they'd build a star base on another colony the turn before and were able to assemble a fleet there and counter-attack the Klingons, wiping out all their ships and knocking their production down to almost nothing.  The Klingons were pretty much out of it by that point but instead of pressing the attack, the Romulans instead made trade agreements with the Ferengi and the Cardassians and just sat back and threw everything into research.  While the Cardassians and I were busy murdering one another and the Klingons sat in the corner licking their wounds,  the Romulans quietly sat back and amassed a tonne of tech and money. 

They then went on a tear and parked powerful fleets on the edge of the Klingon and Cardassian homeworlds and demanded surrender.  We conceded victory to the Romulans.

Fun game.  The Ferengi are very challenging to play as you have to spread yourself very thin and put yourself in a vulnerable position if you want to take advantage of trade deals.  I felt a bit like one of those plover birds that clean the teeth of crocodiles.  One chomp and you're finished, as I discovered with the Cardassians.  The Cardassians were interesting and a lot more effective than I thought they'd be based on their starting restrictions.  Very, very dangerous if you let them develop tech as they can pretty much have a fleet pop out anywhere and wreck your production with hit and fade strikes.


The guy who was playing the Klingons hadn't played before so he was at a bit of a disadvantage and attacked the Romulans a little too quickly.  He took their homeworld but didn't have anything in the way of reserves to protect it from counter-attacks or production to keep his attack going.


Really having a lot of fun with this game.



Map fills in quickly with 4 players 





My aenemic Ferengi fleets, some research projects, and my command console.





The aftermath of the Cardassian betrayal and attack on the Ferengi.